In the same way that we show (with data and figures) that they earn less, we do the same when it occurs in reverse.Because feminism deals with equality.The feminist ideology ABANDERA "the political, economic and social parity between men and women" and no, as many defend to avoid change, the primacy of the female gender.Does not work in that direction.As Emma Watson said in his speech before the United Nations (2014): "The time has come to perceive gender as a spectrum and not as two opposite sets".
If the word, so manida, is hateful, we must keep the idea and ambition that supports.Feminism talks about creating bridges, judging less and empathizing more, of the same love.It is not about creating antagonisms, but about overcoming those that have fed gender stereotypes created by society from the Annals of History.At the end of the day, we are all on the same ship.We are all people without rising symbol ♂ or low ♀.
But it is still representative that the only professional sector (or at least, of the few) where women win more than men are fashion and be linked to the physical attribute of beauty.Casual?Not at all.In a society that judges the image of the woman to the tiredness, a yoke that goes back to the Anitgua Greece when he associated it with "grace" while "the intellect" reserved the man, would be hypocritical (almost histrionic) that did notIt was like that after the level of demand and perfection with which you have to deal with daily.